The Democratization of Accuracy

While writing this, I contemplated titling it, “The Deregulation of Positioning.” As you can see, I changed my mind. I don’t want it to sound like a literal judicial repealing of laws. It’s still, however, something that clearly has occurred and will transform our work and enhance the capabilities of GIS. No longer is high accuracy a luxury that only cash-rich business sectors can afford (utilities, for example). Now, everyone has access to highly accurate GPS tools and workflows without any middlemen or middleware.


Thanks, Standardization

Let’s discuss what’s happened.

First, a long list of technological standards have been adopted and institutionalized in a relatively short time—Bluetooth, REST, NTRIP (don’t worry if you haven’t heard of this one), NEMA, 3G, LTE, Wi-Fi, USB, and many more. It’s a long list, and we use them every day without thinking about them. That’s what makes a good standard. It just works. Second, in 2000, President Clinton intentionally turned off selective availability, making GPS signals accessible to the public. Designed to make GPS more responsive to civil and commercial users, Clinton’s executive decision immediately improved GPS accuracy for the entire world and opened up a market for lower-cost GPS devices and solutions. As a result, GPS manufacturers expanded by building and selling GPS components (e.g., modules or chipsets) not just end-user devices. This created competition for components that could be embedded into all kinds of solutions in a multitude of areas, such as precision agriculture, logistics, and machine control. It also allowed entrepreneurs to apply GPS in innovative ways, such as installing it in appliances in foreclosed homes to track theft, embedding it in gadgets to find lost keys, and enabling it on the now-ubiquitous smartphones and tablets for location services.

Fast-forward to today. We now have highly accurate stand-alone GPS devices, such as the one-meter Bad-Elf GNSS Surveyor, the submeter Trimble Navigation R1, the Spectra Precision Mobile Mapper 300, the Geneq iSXBlue, the single-centimeter Eos Arrow 200, and the super-accurate geodetic Septentrio Altus NR2—and more are coming. These devices don’t come with heavy desktop software to process data; they just produce a highly accurate position that you can use in your own technology or solution. This modularization represents the virtual deregulation of accuracy.


Rock and Roll

Now choose your mobile device: iPhone, iPad, Android phone and tablet, or ruggedized laptop. It really doesn’t matter anymore as long as it has Wi-Fi or Bluetooth capability. Choose your GPS for what accuracy you need (or want—remember that someone once said “accuracy is addictive”). Then choose your GIS (I’m partial to ArcGIS Online, but you can also use Portal for ArcGIS) and download a field app, in this case Collector for ArcGIS or Survey123 for ArcGIS. Configure your system from your desktop and use one of Esri’s excellent basemaps. That’s it. You’re off and running, collecting highly accurate data that goes directly into your system—no middleman, no middleware.

There are all kinds of workflows you can configure, such as using a versioned database to quality check the data before sharing it with everyone. It’s that simple. If you want, you can use a device that bundles the GIS with the hardware for you like Esri/Leica’s ZenoCollector, enabling you to access and edit the same data in the field that you have in the office.

Esri/Leica’s ZenoCollector.

As a surveyor, I’ve always coveted accuracy, as most surveyors do. It’s in our DNA. It’s cool. As a GIS guy, I’ve always preferred to do all my work in a single system: create and manage data, perform unique analysis identify patterns, make maps, and publish and share outcomes. Thanks to high-accuracy positioning and its direct relationship to GIS, now we have the best of both worlds.

Brent Jones

About Brent Jones

Brent Jones, PE and PLS, is Esri's land records/cadastre industry manager. He spearheads worldwide surveying and cadastre practices for Esri and has more than 20 years experience in executive-level technology planning and market development in the engineering, surveying, and geospatial industries.
This entry was posted in Industry Focus. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

4 Comments

  1. glang says:

    If they would add point/vertex averaging and accuracy settings/feedback below 2 meters, we could actually use all the new “high” accuracy devices with Collector. Until then, it feels a little hollow.

  2. saundersp says:

    Hi Brent
    democracy in GPS accuracy is definitely increasing but there is some way to go. The technology platforms you list are still in the multi-thousand dollar range. Hardly democratic on a world scale. Areas such as the USA covered by free WAAS and Europe with EGNOS can achieve sub $500 / sub 3 metre accuracy but the rest of us need to pay well over $3000 for reliable sub 20m accuracy. This is either a one off payment for a receiver or a subscription to a SBAS service (often both).
    I am confident that in the very near future the domination of the differential GPS sector by a few established players will be broken. We probably have enough computing power in our phones to achieve sub-metre accuracy it just needs some techies to clone the software. At the moment the likely source for this appears to be the hobby drone sector. They are chasing very high accuracy, very low power, very small differential GPS.

    Once that occurs we will have truly democratic location services across the world.
    Regards
    Paul

  3. tapeloquin says:

    great article!!… thanks for sharing this!

  4. cliffordokembo says:

    Thanks for this Brent, accuracy is no longer a preserve of a few or a luxury. I foresee the cost of doing survey work reducing and majority being able to achieve sub-meter accuracies with their smartphones. That brings the question, what is the future of surveyors and survey grade hardware?