I have had the fortune of visiting and working on a variety of GIS education projects at universities from Beirut to Bujumbura, Kyoto to San Jose CR. For those readers who are accustomed to working or studying in modern GIS labs with the latest hardware, software and textbooks, well, it turns out that worldwide this is the exception rather than the rule. Traveling around parts of the developing world I have seen many differences but more surprising to me have been the similarities. Here is a short list of some of the lessons, perhaps surprising, I have learned about GIS education from other parts of the world.

An ArcGIS training course as part of
a Masters degree program at UN University,
Tokyo. Students, mostly from developing
nations, were treated to modern facilities.
1. GIS is still new. Although for many of us GIS is a 40-year-old phenomenon, the world is chock-full of institutions that are JUST NOW beginning to learn about the power of GIS in education. The potential growth in developing nations is mindblowing. Most places around the world have just begun scratching the surface of GIS use in secondary schools, which are slowly gaining access to computers and internet connectivity. Much growth can be expected there also, especially if educators follow some of the innovative experiences in places like Canada, The Netherlands and South Africa.
2. Limited Globalization. When I mentioned The Ohio State University at a recent meeting in Ghana, one of the local university administrators said “Hey, I’m a Buckeye!”. Many GIS professors around the world have doctorate degrees from the US and Europe, however are unable to recreate Western-style learning environments when back home due to a lack of resources and institutional support. Important theoretical topics in GI Science, such as geo-semantics or data quality assessment, are not treated in many regions of the world where more practical topics dominate. In fact, GIS research per se, beyond the typical “GIS applied to topic X”, is really quite limited to developed nations.
3. The phone is the platform of the future. Many of today’s students in the developing world do not own a PC or have internet at home, but they do own a mobile phone. From what I have seen in Eastern Africa, for example, the percentages must be something like 30% versus 90%. These students are ready to leapfrog straight to distributed i.e. mobile GIS.
4. Unstable utilities. Many GIS laboratories around the world have computers that function only at certain times, depending on available electricity and maintenance. I tend not to photograph laboratories with “dead” computers out of courtesy, but they are everpresent. Teaching must and does accommodate this reality. The mobile phones, however, do work most of the time!
5. Digital Divide. Many GIS students do not have reliable access to the web and, therefore, are missing out on the vast array of web resources including GIS articles and lessons. Increased access to the web will revolutionize all education, not only in GIS. Dramatically increased bandwidth is now reaching both West and East coasts of Africa, and so we hope expect that connectivity will reach classrooms soon.

A cramped yet functional GIS
lab in Ghana. GIS yes, web no.
6. Private versus Public. Many students are unaware of the private geospatial marketplace, believing instead that their government is the only provider and consumer of geodata. This often lowers their horizons as far as employment opportunities. In Rwanda Esri has been working with government agencies to promote geo-entrepreneurship among young graduates.
7. Role models. Everybody around the world has a relative or friend studying or working in the US or Europe; never ceases to amaze me. This means that many students can imagine themselves working anywhere on Earth, if they can only catch that special break. But do they think that all their lucky friends work for government agencies? And there is now some renewed hope that internet connectivity will provide greater employment opportunity at home and will reduce the legacy of brain-drain.
8. Nike and ArcGIS. Many GIS students in developing nations are eager to learn and to acquire “brand name” software, as is the case also for their phones, their laptops, and their clothing. This is in part because university students tend to come from higher socioeconomic ranks, but also because students see that GIS jobs require knowledge of known commercial software. Software piracy is an issue but certainly not a showstopper, and slowly universities are acquiring site licenses which allow free software distribution to students anyway.
9. Starving for visitors. Almost without exception GIS education programs have asked me to help recruit volunteers to come visit them to teach short courses. Normally the universities or secondary schools are very accommodating regarding housing and hospitality (sometimes the red-carpet treatment can be almost too much). More needs to be done to match “geomentors” with hosts. Opportunities exist in interesting locations such as Accra, Kigali, Macao, Tokyo, or Belize.
10. Need to move beyond the desktop. Most GIS students around the world –including the developed world– are not yet learning what we might call enterprise GIS, that which goes beyond desktop “overlay and buffer” type of exercises, to include data publication and sharing using client/server and cloud infrastructures. This threatens to limit the reach of GIS’s benefits for societal problem solving. Again increased access to internet resources in the classroom is the key.
–
The list could go on of course, but ten seems to be the magic number these days. Overall my view is quite optimistic, because smart students who are given access to resources can flourish anywhere. I welcome your feedback regarding observations you have made regarding GIS education situations around the world.
- Mike Gould, Esri Global Education Manager