<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.esri.com/Dev/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>New ESRI white paper discusses ArcGIS Server and virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.esri.com/Dev/blogs/arcgisserver/archive/2009/06/26/New-ESRI-white-paper-discusses-ArcGIS-Server-and-virtualization.aspx</link><description>Virtualization, which allows multiple operating systems and applications to share the resources of a physical machine, is probably a word that you have heard. Many IT departments are adopting virtualization as part of a broader strategy to conserve resources</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 61120.2)</generator><item><title>re: New ESRI white paper discusses ArcGIS Server and virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.esri.com/Dev/blogs/arcgisserver/archive/2009/06/26/New-ESRI-white-paper-discusses-ArcGIS-Server-and-virtualization.aspx#6662</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:48:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b60b3f0a-e2bd-4be5-8a18-822c697649ab:6662</guid><dc:creator>VBAHole</dc:creator><description>Wow. This is probably the least possible content that can be considered a white paper. Packed into these 8 pages is about 5 sentences of actual information from ESRI concerning how their software will function under virtualization. And the verdict - it will be slower. Thanks for the information-packed paper. And p.s. - if i wanted to learn about what virtualization was i would have gone to wikipedia.</description></item><item><title>re: New ESRI white paper discusses ArcGIS Server and virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.esri.com/Dev/blogs/arcgisserver/archive/2009/06/26/New-ESRI-white-paper-discusses-ArcGIS-Server-and-virtualization.aspx#6764</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:11:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b60b3f0a-e2bd-4be5-8a18-822c697649ab:6764</guid><dc:creator>Lakshmanan</dc:creator><description>I echo same points raised above. Please never call this as white paper, rather document informs that virtualization is possible for ArcGIS Server. No case-studies, test result or scenario to build the same. Please provide indepth details.</description></item><item><title>re: New ESRI white paper discusses ArcGIS Server and virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.esri.com/Dev/blogs/arcgisserver/archive/2009/06/26/New-ESRI-white-paper-discusses-ArcGIS-Server-and-virtualization.aspx#7360</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:01:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b60b3f0a-e2bd-4be5-8a18-822c697649ab:7360</guid><dc:creator>performance_matters</dc:creator><description>We've inquired with our regional ESRI reps and they indicate that ESRI won't "certify" (e.g. provide tech support when things dont work as advertised) ArcGIS Server and SDE production installations inside a virtual environment. What is the story on that?</description></item><item><title>re: New ESRI white paper discusses ArcGIS Server and virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.esri.com/Dev/blogs/arcgisserver/archive/2009/06/26/New-ESRI-white-paper-discusses-ArcGIS-Server-and-virtualization.aspx#7531</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:33:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b60b3f0a-e2bd-4be5-8a18-822c697649ab:7531</guid><dc:creator>Aitor Calero</dc:creator><description>WP Conclusion section:
"With virtualization becoming a standard IT practice and ArcGIS Server supporting all
components of a virtualized environment on supported platforms, more organizations are
considering it for their own ArcGIS Server deployments"

So, imho, it is fully supported as long as the OS was also supported.

</description></item></channel></rss>